How the science community can end sexual harassment | Hope Jahren

Women make up 47% of the U.S. workforce, but only (on average) 23.75% of the science-based jobs out there. Geobiologist and author Hope Jahren wants to change that and make that number higher. She argues that there aren't enough safeguards in place to ensure a safe working environment for women. Are the adequate sexual harassment policies in place, and will the workplace uphold them if needs be? Talking about these issues and making them a public issue will inevitably draw more women to positions in science, she posits, and thus raise the average. Read more at BigThink.com: https://ift.tt/2DVNXM9 Follow Big Think here: YouTube: http://goo.gl/CPTsV5 Facebook: https://ift.tt/1qJMX5g Twitter: https://twitter.com/bigthink I think as you move to the upper ranks of science—ranks being positions of influence and access—you see fewer female faces. And I think the basic reason is the same reason that you don't see a lot of female faces in Congress or on the Supreme Court or on the directing board of Fortune500 companies. I think there are fundamental power imbalances between the sexes that play themselves out in society. And I think science is just not immune to that—which actually isn't a very controversial stance if you think about it. Science is performed by people, and it's subject to all the various foibles that plague the rest of our social dynamics. Believe it or not, I don't have very controversial views on the subject. I always go back to basic questions we ask about women's labor—because working in science is performing labor, and performing it as a woman is woman's labor. And one of the very first questions always asked about women's labor is: is it safe? And so I've spoken about how women laboring in a science are not working in safe spaces all of the time. That's just question number one: Are we safe while we're trying to learn? Are we safe while we're trying to work? There are a few things about science that are special. Women live in a world where we are forced to consider our safety at every turn. We minimize risk while we maximize activity. It's this constant balancing act that we do. Now, in science we also go to unfamiliar places and we do things that haven't been done before, and we work alone in buildings late at night, and we move through groups of people that are largely dominated by men. And all of those things present special consideration for the safety of women in spaces. So I think there are some specific things in science that come into play. I think step number two, after we ask whether women are safe, is: what are the legal protections that are in place? What are the institutional and civil protections in place to defend women's safety within their work spaces? I think young women often don't know what the sexual harassment policy is at their university or is at their place of work. They may not know the details of Title IX how Title IX protects their educational experience. I would say that learning those details and considering what recourse might be is a useful exercise. It's probably more useful than some kind of seminar that advises you on how to modify your behavior so that you're less likely to provoke harassing behavior, something like that. Learn what the regulations and laws are that protect you so that if you have to you can make difficult choices with awareness. I think that's the responsible advice to give women as they start to labor within these spaces. We are more open about sexual harassment and sexual assault than we used to be. And I think that can be regarded as a victory in its own right. I think combating isolation around these issues is important, and I think the Internet, for example, has connected women in ways in which they weren't connected before.